I've never felt so invigorated as the first time I saw Kill Bill when I was thirteen. Kill Bill Volume 2 followed, then Pulp Fiction, then Jackie Brown, then Inglorious Bastards, then Reservoir Dogs. I can't exactly remember the order, but it definitely wasn't chronological. But Quentin Tarantino isn't like Iñárritu, who adopts a different aesthetic with every new film; no, Tarantino has been building his own genre and perfecting his own signature for the past twenty years. And so I invite you to dive into Tarantino's twisted, bloody creation: a world filled with jubilant violence, masterful tension, and empowering revenge.
Certain people are rather skeptical of Tarantino's work, and will tell you something along the lines of: "Movies that strictly comprise of blood and violence don't elevate the public and are therefore detrimental." However those who have seen the entirety of Tarantino's art will know the opposite is true. Take the movie Jackie Brown, for example.
Sure, Jackie Brown features Tarantino's usual dose of violence (if not a little less), but violence isn't the goal of the film. Jackie Brown portrays the glorious process of overcoming adversity through the eyes of a black flight attendant. Saying that Jackie Brown, or any of Tarantino's films, are solely about violence, is both disparaging and erroneous. But since we're talking about violence, let's talk about it how Tarantino employs it in his works.
You may have seen or heard of a Clockwork Orange (1971), Stanley Kubrick's sensational film. When this movie was released, it struck the public as extremely controversial: not only did it include vulgar humor and British delinquents, it also seemed to glorify raw, gratuitous violence. From the original novel a Clockwork Orange, written by Anthony Burgess, was born the term "ultraviolence," which, as you may have already guessed, refers to horrible and extreme violence.
But then what is the point of ultraviolence depicted in cinema? In my opinion, it comes from a desire to merely reflect, or rather rephrase, the violence of our current society. Some people saw in Django Unchained (2012) a critique of modern-day discrimination faced by black communities. Perhaps Tarantino isn't trying to glorify violence; maybe he's only trying to express how he sees in the world around him.
And even if violence was the main goal of Tarantino's movies, why not view it as art? Why not appreciate the creativity and the intricacy of each murder, amputation and branding scene? Why not relish in symbolism and aesthetic prowess?
In sum, I think there's something worth appreciating in the way Tarantino depicts violence. The best thing you can take away from Tarantino's films, in my opinion, is empowerment: his characters emanate creative and emotional empowerment in the face of adversity.
Here is a list of Tarantino movies I've seen, in order of release:
Reservoir Dogs (1992) 🏢🏢🏢🏢
Pulp Fiction (1994) 🏢🏢🏢🏢🏢
Jackie Brown (1997) 🏢🏢🏢🏢
Kill Bill: Volume 1 (2003) 🏢🏢🏢🏢
Kill Bill: Volume 2 (2004) 🏢🏢🏢🏢
Death Proof (2007) 🏢🏢🏢🏢
Inglorious Besterds (2009) 🏢🏢🏢🏢🏢
Django Unchained (2012) 🏢🏢🏢🏢
The Hateful Eight (2015) 🏢🏢🏢🏢🏢

